Children with Pre-K
Education Bills
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
July 24, 2008
Two bills now in the House of
Representatives provide further evidence the
government wants to tell you how to raise your
children. The Pre-K Act (HR 3289) and the
Education Begins at Home Act (HR 2343) aim
to micromanage families in the military and
those that fall below the poverty line.
According to Chelsea Schilling, writing for
WorldNetDaily, the two bills could give the
federal government unprecedented control
over the way parents raise their children even
providing funds for state workers to come into
homes and screen babies for emotional and
developmental problems. The proposed
legislation supposedly aims to prevent child
abuse, evaluate medical conditions, and
close the achievement gap in education
between poor and minority infants versus
middle-class children.
Of course, only the government is capable of
determining the emotional and developmental
problems of children, not parents. Under this
program, ready for debate in the House, the
government will decide the cultural
awareness of children, not parents. There’s
some blather in the language of the bill about
having cultural awareness of the differences
in parenting practices, but it seems like that
never applies to Christian parents,
pediatrician Karen Effrem told WND. In other
words, the state will decide what sort of
education children receive and that process
will now start before kids enter a state
inculcation camp, otherwise known as a
public school. In fact, the language of HR
3289 lovingly called the Pre-K Act suggests
children are to be steered into a preschool or
daycare that follows state standards while
mothers are to be moved into the workforce,
that is to say disassociated from the
education of their children.
Once they are involved, they don’t have any
say over curriculum, Effrem said. There’s
plenty of evidence of preschool curriculum that
deals with issues that have nothing to do with
a child’s academic development like gender,
gender identity, careers, environmentalism,
multiculturalism, feminism and all of that
things that don’t amount to a hill of beans as
far as a child learning how to read. In other
words, children will be brainwashed by the
state. State education obviously has nothing
to do with literacy or academic development. It
has to do with making sure children are
trained to follow the dictates of the state. It is
about breaking down the family in deference
to feminism, gender identity, and careers
outside the family. It is about family planning
and eugenics.
As Effrem notes (see Preschool
Socioemotional Screening), a movement
already exists within organized psychiatry to
label and drug people mentally ill based on
highly controversial political and religious
criteria, such as ‘intolerance’. Due to
reimbursement patterns, government
promotion, and pharmaceutical industry
influence, treatment almost always means
use of psychotropic drugs. According to a
survey of members of the American Academy
of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9 out of 10
children that see a psychiatrist receive a
prescription for psychoactive drugs.
While HR 3289 and HR 2343 may not be
mandatory for low-income and military
families, there is no wording in the Education
Begins at Home Act requiring parental
permission for treatment or ongoing care
once the family is enrolled a point that leads
some to ask where parental rights end and
the government takes over, writes Schilling.
Obviously, according to the state, parents do
not have rights, especially if they are intolerant
Christians, home schoolers, or they have their
own ideas about how their children should be
educated. Once passed, it is said HR 3289
and HR 2343 will be voluntary, but as we
know such programs have a way of eventually
becoming mandatory, especially if a family is
receiving some sort of state or federal
assistance.
If we and our children do not want to be a
sociologically-controlled and semi-ignorant
members of the United Nations New World
Order, we need to recognize the importance of
knowledge, and reject attempts at emotional
manipulation and knowledge limitation, writes
Erica Carle. Today’s problem-solving and
decision-making system of education uses
students, plays on their emotions, and tries to
alienate them from those who should be
closest to them. It creates animosity between
classmates; wastes valuable learning time by
forcing students to form opinions and listen to
the uninformed opinions of their classmates;
and discourages intelligent and moral
behavior. It turns students against their own
country and its Constitution in favor of the
United Nations New World Order
management system. Is this what we want for
America’s children? If not, let’s get to work
informing our state’s legislators that they
must reclaim the schools and restore the
Constitution.
HR 3289 and HR 2343, likely to become
mandatory for all pre-school age children, is
part and parcel of this New World Order
management system.
have been shown to increase
the likelihood that children
will be immunized, facilitate
breastfeeding, and reduce
the risk of infections.
From:
http://www.momsrising.org/maternity
Only a few countries in the world do not offer
some form of paid parental leave - Australia,
the United States, Liberia, Swaziland,
Lesotho, and Papua New Guinea.
There is currently a push to expand paid
maternity leave in the United States. One
organization supporting paid maternity leave
in the United States is Moms Rising.
Having a baby is a leading cause of "poverty
spells" in the U.S. -- when income dips below
what's needed for basic living expenses.
In the U.S., 49% of mothers cobble together
paid leave following childbirth by using sick
days, vacation days, disability leave, and
maternity leave.
51% of new mothers lack any paid leave -- so
some take unpaid leave, some quit, some
even lose their jobs.
Paid family leave has been shown to reduce
infant mortality by as much as 20% (and the
U.S. ranks a low 37th of all countries in infant
mortality).
In Canada maternity and parental leave is
paid for by the Employment Insurance system.
Parental leave is an employee benefit that
provides paid or unpaid time off work to care
for a child or make arrangements for the
child's welfare. In 2000, parental leave was
greatly expanded in Canada from 10 weeks to
35 weeks divided as desired between two
parents. This is in addition to 15 weeks
maternity leave, giving a total possible period
of 50 weeks paid leave for a mother.
If you are a US citizen and interested in
supporting your right for Maternity or Parental
Leave please visit momsrising.org.
Giant transnational companies are carrying out a dangerous global experiment by attempting to introduce large numbers of genetically
engineered foods widely into our food supply. Because genetic manipulations can generate unanticipated harmful side-effects, and
because genetically engineered foods are not tested sufficiently to eliminate those that are dangerous, this experiment, not only
jeopardizes the health of individuals, but could also lead to national or even global food shortages and large-scale health threats.
There is no logical scientific justification for exposing society to this risk, nor is it necessary to take this risk for the purpose of feeding
humanity. It is only of benefit to the biotech industry, which will obtain short term commercial gains at the expense of the health and
safety of the whole population. Tampering with the genetic code of food is reckless and poses a serious threat to life. It could easily
upset the delicate balance between our physiology and the foods that we eat. There is already ample scientific justification for an
immediate ban on genetically modified foods in order to safeguard our health.
CAMPAIGN TO BAN GENETICALLY ENGINEERED FOOD
For further information or to offer your support for this campaign, please contact jfagan@mum.edu
Source: http://www.netlink.de/gen/fagan.html
